1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 6210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3690 mm |
