1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Range Rover | 323 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |
