1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (188 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Range Rover | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
