1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1238 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 1996 Land Rover Range Rover has manual transmission. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | CQ-X |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 852 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |
