1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. (188 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 639 kg more than 2001 Volvo Hatric.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (320 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo Hatric. (280 Nm). This means 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo Hatric. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 1996 Land Rover Range Rover has manual transmission. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
| Model | Range Rover | Hatric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2800 mm |
