1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover (188 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |