1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. (188 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover.

Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1996 Land Rover Range Rover has manual transmission. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: