1996 Lincoln Continental vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Lincoln Continental is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 430 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lincoln Continental | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Continental | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2680 mm |
