1996 Lincoln Continental vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lincoln Continental (218 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lincoln Continental | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Lincoln | Acura |
Model | Continental | TL |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2840 mm |