1996 Lincoln Sentinel vs. 1990 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel weights approximately 589 kg more than 1990 Mazda 626.
Because 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lincoln Sentinel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel has automatic transmission and 1990 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1990 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lincoln Sentinel | 1990 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | Sentinel | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2580 mm |