1996 Lincoln Sentinel vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lincoln Sentinel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lincoln Sentinel would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel weights approximately 749 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lincoln Sentinel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lincoln Sentinel | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Sentinel | 2 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 3890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2500 mm |
