1996 Lincoln Sentinel vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lincoln Sentinel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lincoln Sentinel would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lincoln Sentinel weights approximately 131 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5.
Because 1996 Lincoln Sentinel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lincoln Sentinel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lincoln Sentinel | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Sentinel | 5 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 4610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2751 mm |
