1996 Lotec Testa de Oro vs. 2000 Nissan Maxima

To start off, 2000 Nissan Maxima is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro (741 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 519 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Maxima. (222 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Maxima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro weights approximately 116 kg more than 2000 Nissan Maxima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Maxima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Maxima. (292 Nm). This means 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Maxima.

Compare all specifications: