1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1942 Peugeot 202
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1942 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1942 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 235 kg more than 1942 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1942 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
Model | Elan | 202 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1132 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2460 mm |