1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Lotus | Morgan |
Model | Elan | 4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |