1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1500 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Elan | 1500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |