1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 520 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lotus Elan | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Lotus | Suzuki |
| Model | Elan | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2060 mm |
