1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 110 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Colt |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2360 mm |