1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 15 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lotus Elan | 1979 Seat 131 | |
| Make | Lotus | Seat |
| Model | Elan | 131 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1005 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2500 mm |
