1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Sapporo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |