1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1989 Rover 216
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1989 Rover 216. (114 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1989 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover 216 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Rover 216. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1989 Rover 216 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Elan | 216 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2550 mm |