1996 Lotus Elan vs. 1999 Mazda B3000
To start off, 1999 Mazda B3000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B3000. (198 Nm). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 1999 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | B3000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2840 mm |