1996 Lotus Elan vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elan. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 1996 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1996 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | Lotus | MG |
Model | Elan | X20 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |