1996 Lotus Elan vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lotus Elan | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Micra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2449 mm |