1996 Lotus Elise vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elise is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elise (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda 929 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elise.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elise (169 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lotus Elise | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elise | 929 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2620 mm |
