1996 Mahindra Armada vs. 1979 Volvo 265
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,662 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 600 kg more than 1979 Volvo 265.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mahindra Armada | 1979 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
Model | Armada | 265 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4890 mm |