1996 Mahindra Armada vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mahindra Armada | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
| Model | Armada | C70 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4730 mm |
