1996 Mahindra Armada vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1996 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mahindra Armada | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mahindra | Ford |
Model | Armada | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4228 mm |