1996 Mahindra Armada vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mahindra Armada | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mahindra | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 360 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
