1996 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 482 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 85 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Mahindra | Cadillac |
| Model | Armada | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4788 mm |
