1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. (340 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Marcos Mantis. (407 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Marcos Mantis.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Marcos Mantis | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Marcos | Mercury |
Model | Mantis | Park Lane |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 352 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 626 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3130 mm |