1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 278 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Marcos Mantis | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Marcos | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mantis | Colt |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 352 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2390 mm |
