1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 1986 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Marcos Mantis | 1986 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Marcos | Plymouth |
Model | Mantis | Reliant |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 352 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2260 mm |