1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 244 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (146 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Marcos Mantis | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Marcos | Toyota |
Model | Mantis | RunX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 352 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |