1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 189 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Rexton. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Rexton.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Marcos Mantis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Rexton. (340 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Marcos Mantis | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Marcos | SsangYong |
| Model | Mantis | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 352 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2830 mm |
