1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Marcos Mantis | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Marcos | Renault |
Model | Mantis | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 352 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |