1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 211 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Marcos Mantis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Marcos Mantis | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Marcos | Mazda |
Model | Mantis | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 352 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 158 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3010 mm |