1996 Marcos Mantis vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Marcos Mantis | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Marcos | Volvo |
| Model | Mantis | C30 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 352 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
