1996 Maserati Shamal vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Maserati Shamal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Maserati Shamal | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | Shamal | AZ |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3217 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2370 mm |
