1996 Maserati Shamal vs. 2008 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2008 Holden Caprice is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Maserati Shamal. (321 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1996 Maserati Shamal.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Maserati Shamal. (444 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Maserati Shamal. 2008 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1996 Maserati Shamal has manual transmission. 1996 Maserati Shamal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: