1996 Mazda 121 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 179 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 121 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 121 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 991 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |