1996 Mazda 121 vs. 1998 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1998 Nissan Cima is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Cima weights approximately 472 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121.
Because 1998 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 121 | 1998 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 121 | Cima |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1064 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |