1996 Mazda 121 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 421 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 121 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 121 | ZT |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1064 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |