1996 Mazda 121 vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 121 | 2010 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | 121 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2578 mm |
