1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 626 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1770 mm |