1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 160 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 1979 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 1979 Mercedes-Benz T | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 626 | T |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2800 mm |