1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1984 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1984 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1984 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1984 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 1984 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 626 | Ronda |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2460 mm |