1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1996 Pininfarina Eta
To start off, both 1996 Mazda 626 and 1996 Pininfarina Eta were released in the same year (1996). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Pininfarina Eta has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Pininfarina Eta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 1996 Pininfarina Eta | |
| Make | Mazda | Pininfarina |
| Model | 626 | Eta |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
