1996 Mazda 626 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 61 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 626 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |
