1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2001 Volvo C70
To start off, 2001 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo C70 (165 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo C70 weights approximately 453 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo C70 (217 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 2001 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 626 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1658 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2800 mm |
